Confusing things about the "woke" left.


It's strange to many how the left thinks today.  The TV show South Park captured this well.  A school principal called "PC principal" is urinating in the bathroom.  Cartman, a manipulative boy, comes in carrying another little boy's underwear.  He then places said underwear in the urinal so that the principal's dna is now on it.  He begins to threaten the principal.  He says he will frame him as a pedophile unless the principal is less strict.  The principal is just confused the entire time.  So Cartman has to explain it again.  When he does, he uses the word "capisce."  The principal is immediately angry because this Italian word assumes that Italians are greedy extortionists.  Oblivious to the claim of pedophilia, he brutally beats Cartman, a small boy.  Thus, he ends up abusing a minor anyway as a response to what he calls a "microaggression."


Why does such an interaction seem silly to most but make perfect sense to many on the left today?  It's simple really.  They're conspiracy theorists.  Marxists see every system in society as a tool to keep people poor and oppressed.  In their mind, there is an evil cabal of rich people who have infected society with all sorts of systems that brainwash us into our own poverty.  

These include but are not limited to:

1)women wanting to raise children

2)the existence of gender at all

3)religion

4)all white people are brainwashed into being white supremacists by their unconscious bias, and they cannot undo this.  They are the unwitting pawns of the evil bourgeoisie


Let's use a hypothetical example to apply this.  Let's say that you assume someone you meet is a male with your pronoun use.  Let's say this person is biologically male but identifies as a female.  Let's say that everyone there is now incredibly offended at what you said.  How should you respond?


It's simple.  

"I don't believe in a conspiracy theory of a big bogeyman of rich people.  Does anyone have any evidence that misgendering someone really does so much damage if any at all?  If your conspiracy theory was true, then my pronoun usage has perpetuated one of the most horrifically oppressive brainwashing scams the world has ever seen.  So you would be justified in any level of violent retribution against me.  No evil you commit against me compares to the horrifying system I'm perpetuating.  But all of this rests on your Marxist conspiracy theory.  And it's one that you have zero evidence for.  Maybe Gender isn't a social construct and I've just made a simple honest mistake?"

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Old Testament Law and Slavery

  The Mosaic law has many requirements regarding workers. These workers are more like a servants instead of a slaves. This becomes clear in the details of the law as we look past the word “slave.” The people of this time and region did not have the ability to sail to far away lands and obtain slaves. Slaves were the result of conquest and war. There was also a form of servitude often called “debt slavery.” Here a person had borrowed money and could not pay it back. So he sold himself as a servant for money that paid off the debt. He would then be required to work as repayment. As we read the Mosaic law as well as the law code of Hammurabi, this form of being a debt servant becomes obvious. But it confuses modern readers because we are unfamiliar with it. Debt Servitude, Not Slavery 1: Servants are paid money up front for work. This is because the person owed a debt that could not be paid and becoming a servant was a way to pay it off. I should...
Read more

Brief refutation of the Flavian Hypothesis

  Under the Flavian Conspiracy theory, Christianity was invented by the Flavian emperors (Vespasian, Titus, & Domitian 69 - 96 AD).  They supposedly did this as a way to control people by inventing a false religion. Emperors are well known for creating religious movements as a way of controlling people, but  this was primarily a matter of declaring an emperor to be a god. For example, Domitian had Titus declared a god. But this worked within paganism.  Augustus was said to be secretly fathered by Apollo while his mother was at the temple.  The imperial cult boasted temples across the empire.  Cities without a statue of Augustus were rare.   A primary problem with the Flavian Conspiracy is that Christianity is subversive of Roman morality.  While it is not openly rebellious, it is harmful to Roman values in other ways.  Christians would not make sacrifices to pagan gods or praise the genius (divine right to rule) of the emperor.  T...
Read more

Should hypocritical ministers be called out?

  In past years, I've heard some say that hypocritical and even disbelieving ministers should not be criticized since they carry on a public ministry that preaches the correct thing. These preachers do this to avoid scrutiny while gathering a small group of disbelievers, but play the role of a godly minister on a larger scale. What is truly amazing is that they cite the Apostle Paul in support! They refer to Philippians 1:15-18. Here, Paul rejoices that people are coming to salvation through some jealous preachers that really just want to end Paul’s ministry. And so people told me that we should just keep our mouths shut since the good outweighs the bad. In fact, we should just rejoice that people are being saved like Paul did! This level of confusion and irrationality is truly fascinating to me. I’m honestly trying to understand it. How is it that you miss the obvious? You are seeing the Bible only as something people read. After all, that is all it has...
Read more